퍼펙트한ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor퍼펙트최신덤프문제최신버전덤프데모문제다운받기

Drag to rearrange sections
HTML/Embedded Content

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor퍼펙트 최신 덤프문제, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor합격보장 가능 덤프, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor완벽한 덤프문제자료, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor높은 통과율 공부자료, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor최고패스자료

참고: Itexamdump에서 Google Drive로 공유하는 무료 2026 PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 시험 문제집이 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rBkYoebM1ouMFc7tQtnjb3Aplqz7hXe_

Itexamdump의 PECB인증 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험덤프는 실제시험의 기출문제와 예상문제를 묶어둔 공부자료로서 시험문제커버율이 상당히 높습니다.IT업계에 계속 종사하려는 IT인사들은 부단히 유력한 자격증을 취득하고 자신의 자리를 보존해야 합니다. Itexamdump의 PECB인증 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험덤프로 어려운 PECB인증 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험을 쉽게 패스해보세요. IT자격증 취득이 여느때보다 여느일보다 쉬워져 자격증을 많이 따는 꿈을 실현해드립니다.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 시험요강:

주제 소개
주제 1
  • Fundamental principles and concepts of an AI management system: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and covers the basic principles of artificial intelligence, including ethical use, trustworthiness, and transparency. It introduces the purpose and importance of having an AI management system in place for responsible AI governance.
주제 2
  • Fundamental audit concepts and principles: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and outlines essential audit concepts such as evidence collection, impartiality, objectivity, and ethical conduct. It introduces the core principles that form the foundation of a reliable and consistent auditing process.
주제 3
  • Preparing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.
주제 4
  • Closing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.

>> ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor퍼펙트 최신 덤프문제 <<

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor합격보장 가능 덤프 - ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor완벽한 덤프문제자료

IT자격증을 많이 취득하여 IT업계에서 자신만의 단단한 자리를 보장하는것이 여러분들의 로망이 아닐가 싶습니다. Itexamdump의 완벽한 PECB인증 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor덤프는 IT전문가들이 자신만의 노하우와 경험으로 실제PECB인증 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험문제에 대비하여 연구제작한 완벽한 작품으로서 100%시험통과율을 보장합니다.

최신 AI management system (AIMS) ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 무료샘플문제 (Q146-Q151):

질문 # 146
Did ImoAI take the correct initial step after the major nonconformity was detected?
Scenario 9: ImoAl, headquartered in California. USA, provides Al solutions for various industries such as finance, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing. Its clients include major financial institutions seeking Al powered fraud detection systems, healthcare providers leveraging Al for diagnostics and patient care, retailers optimizing supply chain management with Al forecasting, and manufacturers enhancing production efficiency through Al-driven automation.
ImoAl has recently undergone a certification audit to ensure that its artificial intelligence management system AIMS is in compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. During the audit, a major nonconformity related to data security protocols was identified, requiring urgent resolution.
ImoAl swiftly initiated corrective actions to address the
major nonconformity. The audit follow-up, in agreement with the auditee, was scheduled six weeks after the initial audit. As part of exploring alternatives to audit follow-up, the audit team leader chose to verify the effectiveness of the actions taken by the auditee by scheduling a specific visit to ImoAI's premises.
The follow-up audit involved a thorough evaluation of the effectiveness of these actions. The audit team leader thoroughly examined the corrections, corrective actions, and root cause analysis conducted by ImoAl to assess whether they adequately addressed the nonconformity identified during the initial audit.
In conjunction with the external audit follow-up, ImoAl engaged its internal auditing team to oversee the progress of corrective actions. The AIMS manager of ImoAl updated Ms. Rebecca Hayes, the internal auditor, on the status of corrections and corrective actions prompted by the nonconformity identified during the external audit. Subsequently, Ms. Hayes thoroughly reviewed these measures, analyzing the corrections, root causes, and effectiveness of the implemented actions.
Upon satisfactory validation of the action plans, ImoAl was recommended for certification.

  • A. Yes, as it promptly initiated corrective actions to address the major nonconformity
  • B. No, because it should have immediately informed its clients about the detected nonconformity
  • C. No, as it should have waited for further instructions from the certification body before taking action

정답：A

설명：
According to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 10.2 (Nonconformity and Corrective Action) and ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6.3, organizations are expected to act promptly to correct and prevent recurrence of detected nonconformities. ImoAI correctly initiated corrective actions immediately after a major nonconformity was found. This is the recommended and required first step to contain and resolve issues and demonstrate responsibility.
* Notifying clients is not a mandatory first step unless the nonconformity directly affects them.
* Waiting for instructions from the certification body could unnecessarily delay resolution.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 10.2 - Corrective Action
ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6.3 - Corrective action expectations following audit findings
\===========


질문 # 147
Scenario 1 (continued):
To ensure the integrity of the AI system, Future Horizon Academy has implemented measures to ensure that training data remain isolated from data that could lead to harmful or undesirable outcomes. The institution adds significant data elements as metadata, transforms the data into a format usable by the AI system, and uses data from one or more trusted sources.
Committed to standardization and continual improvement, Future Horizon Academy decided to implement an artificial intelligence management system (AIMS) based on ISO/IEC 42001 that would help the institution increase operational efficiency, resulting in improved processes.
After having the AIMS in place for a year, the institution decided to apply for a certification audit to get certified against ISO/IEC 42001. Prior to the certification audit, the institution conducted an internal audit and management review to ensure that the AIMS aligns with the institution's own requirements and that the system is being maintained effectively.
Question:
Based on functionality, what type of AI system did Future Horizon Academy establish?

  • A. General AI
  • B. Reactive machines
  • C. Limited memory
  • D. Theory of mind

정답：C

설명：
The AI system described uses training data and prior experience (historical data) to make decisions, which matches Limited Memory systems. ISO/IEC 22989:2022 (supportive reference) categorizes Limited Memory AI as those that rely on past data and metadata to improve decision making, and ISO/IEC 42001 refers to AI functionality understanding under Clause 4.2 when considering context and system type.
Reference: ISO/IEC 22989:2022 Section 5.2.3; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 4.2.


질문 # 148
During an audit, the auditor uncovers sensitive data regarding the AI system's algorithms and their decision-making processes. Which principle must the auditor adhere to when handling this information?

  • A. Integrity
  • B. Fair Presentation
  • C. Evidence-Based Approach
  • D. Confidentiality

정답：D

설명：
The correct principle isConfidentiality.
ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 4(e)states that auditors mustrespect the confidentiality of informationacquired during the audit and use it only for audit purposes. This includessensitive or proprietary data, such as AI algorithms, models, and proprietary decision logic.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3reinforces that anyinternal or sensitive company information discovered must besafeguarded and never disclosedwithout authorization.


질문 # 149
Scenario 7 (continued):
Scenario 7: ICure, headquartered in Bratislava, is a medical institution known for its use of the latest technologies in medical practices. Ithas introduced groundbreaking Al-driven diagnostics and treatment planning tools that have fundamentally transformed patient care.
ICure has integrated a robust artificial intelligence management system AIMS to manage its Al systems effectively. This holisticmanagement framework ensures that ICure's Al applications are not only developed but also deployed and maintained to adhere to the highest industry standards, thereby enhancing efficiency and reliability.
ICure has initiated a comprehensive auditing process to validate its AIMS's effectiveness in alignment with ISO/IEC 42001. The stage 1audit involved an on-site evaluation by the audit team. The team evaluated the site-specific conditions, interacted with ICure's personnel, observed the deployed technologies, and reviewed the operations that support the AIMS. Following these observations, the findings weredocumented and communicated to ICure. setting the stage for subsequent actions.
Unforeseen delays and resource allocation issues introduced a significant gap between the completion of stage
1 and the onset of stage2 audits. This interval, while unplanned, provided an opportunity for reflection and preparation for upcoming challenges.
After four months, the audit team initiated the stage 2 audit. They evaluated AIMS's compliance with ISO
/IEC 42001 requirements, payingspecial attention to the complexity of processes and their documentation. It was during this phase that a critical observation was made:
ICure had not fully considered the complexity of its processes and their interactions when determining the extent of documentedinformation. Essential processes related to Al model training, validation, and deployment were not documented accurately, hinderingeffective control and management of these critical activities. This issue was recorded as a minor nonconformity, signaling a need forenhanced control and management of these vital activities.
Simultaneously, the auditor evaluated the appropriateness and effectiveness of the "AIMS Insight Strategy," a procedure developed by ICure to determine the AIMS internal and external challenges. This examination identified specific areas for improvement, particularly in the way stakeholder input was integrated into the system. It highlighted how this could significantly enhance the contribution of relevant parties in strengthening the system's resilience and effectiveness.
The audit team determined the audit findings by taking into consideration the requirements of ICure, the previous audit records and conclusions, the accuracy, sufficiency, and appropriateness of evidence, the extent to which planned audit activities are realized and planned results achieved, the sample size, and the categorization of the audit findings. The audit team decided to first record all the requirements met; then they proceeded to record the nonconformities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Did the audit team consider all the necessary aspects when determining audit findings?

  • A. Yes, the audit team considered all the necessary aspects for determining audit findings
  • B. No, the audit team overlooked the importance of the auditee's feedback in shaping the audit findings
  • C. No, audit team did not consider the findings exceeding normal practices or opportunities for improvement

정답：A

설명：
The scenario states that the audit team considered:
* audit objectives
* audit criteria
* planned results
* sample size
* conformity to requirements
* and previous records - all key elements ofaudit evidence analysis.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.5andISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6confirm that audit findings must be based onobjective evidence, conformity criteria, and audit scope.This matches what the audit team did, confirming full compliance.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.5; ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6.


질문 # 150
Which of the following statements regarding the interested parties related to the AIMS is correct?

  • A. Applicable interested parties may have expectations related to climate change initiatives
  • B. Internal parties can include regulators and legislators
  • C. The specific needs and expectations of interested parties to be addressed through the AIMS are determined by organizational discretion

정답：A

설명：
Clause 4.2 of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 requires the organization to determine:
The interested parties that are relevant to the AI Management System.
The relevant needs and expectations of these parties.
Which needs and expectations become compliance obligations.
"Interested parties" include both internal and external stakeholders, such as customers, regulators, suppliers, society, and NGOs. These parties may have expectations related to environmental impact, ethics, privacy, fairness - and increasingly, climate change initiatives.
Option A is correct because ISO/IEC 42001 recognizes environmental and sustainability-related expectations as part of societal or stakeholder concerns, especially under responsible AI governance.
Option B is incorrect because regulators and legislators are external, not internal parties.
Option C is misleading - organizations must assess and formally determine relevant needs and expectations, not at their discretion but in alignment with ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 4.2.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 4.2 - Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Annex A - Considerations for stakeholder engagement PECB AI Lead Auditor Study Guide, Chapter 4.2


질문 # 151
......

Itexamdump는IT업계전문가들이 그들의 노하우와 몇 년간의 경험 등으로 자료의 정확도를 높여 응시자들의 요구를 만족시켜 드립니다. 우리는 꼭 한번에PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험을 패스할 수 있도록 도와드릴 것입니다. 여러분은PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험자료 구매로 제일 정확하고 또 최신시험버전의 문제와 답을 사용할 수 있습니다. Pass4Tes의 인증시험적중 율은 아주 높습니다. 때문에 많은 IT인증시험준비중인분들에세 많은 편리를 드릴수 있습니다.100%정확도 100%신뢰.여러분은 마음편히 응시하시면 됩니다.

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor합격보장 가능 덤프: https://www.itexamdump.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor.html

2026 Itexamdump 최신 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor PDF 버전 시험 문제집과 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 시험 문제 및 답변 무료 공유: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rBkYoebM1ouMFc7tQtnjb3Aplqz7hXe_

html    
Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content
rich_text    

Page Comments